Abstract

As the second most widely used artificial lift method in petroleum production (and first in produced amount), electrical submersible pump (ESP) maintains or increases flow rate by converting kinetic energy to hydraulic pressure of hydrocarbon fluids. To facilitate its optimal working conditions, an ESP has to be operated within a narrow application window. Issues like gas involvement, changing production rate and high oil viscosity, greatly impede ESP boosting pressure. Previous experimental studies showed that the presence of gas would cause ESP hydraulic head degradation. The flow behaviors inside ESPs under gassy conditions, such as pressure surging and gas pockets, further deteriorate ESP pressure boosting ability. Therefore, it is important to know what parameters govern the gas-liquid flow structure inside a rotating ESP and how it can be modeled. This paper presents a comprehensive review on the key factors that affect ESP performance under gassy flow conditions. Furthermore, the empirical and mechanistic models for predicting ESP pressure increment are discussed. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based modeling approach for studying the multiphase flow in a rotating ESP is explained as well. The closure relationships that are critical to both mechanistic and numerical models are reviewed, which are helpful for further development of more accurate models for predicting ESP gas-liquid flow behaviors.

Highlights

  • The electrical submersible pump (ESP), as a high-efficiency downhole equipment for converting kinetic energy to hydraulic pressure head, has improved significantly since it was invented in the1910’s by the Russian engineer Arutunoff

  • The main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of literature concerning

  • The experimental studies and modeling approaches for investigating gas/liquid two-phase flow inside a rotating electrical submersible pump have been reviewed in detail

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The electrical submersible pump (ESP), as a high-efficiency downhole equipment for converting kinetic energy to hydraulic pressure head, has improved significantly since it was invented in the. As a type of centrifugal pumps, ESPs can be classified into three different categories: radial, axial and mixed types based on the dimensionless specific speed (NS). ΩS is rotational speed (rad/s), Q is liquid flow rate (m3 /s), g is local gravitational acceleration (m/s2 ), H is pump head (m). Nq = 0.75 h where N, q and h are rotational speed (rpm), flow rate (gpm) and pump head (ft), respectively. N, q and h are rotationalpumps speed (rpm), flow rate (gpm) and pump head (ft),axial respectively. With the liquid flow rate increase, the ESP performance curves exhibit different trends. Models in predicting ESP hydraulic boosting pressure under gas-liquid flow conditions

Euler Head
C U C U U C U1C1U
Head Loss Mechanisms
Experimental Studies
Single-Phase Tests
Two-Phase Tests
Flow Pattern Recognition
Impeller flow behavior behavior at at N
10. Visualized flow patterns rotating flow
Modeling Approaches
Emperical Correlations
One-Dimension Two-Fluid Modeling
13. Typical
Mechanistic Modeling
Flow Pattern Map and Transition Boundary
Flow Model
Mechanistic Model Calculation
Closure Relationship
20. Comparison
In-Situ
Findings
Conclusions and Future Work
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call