Abstract

The number of patients placed on kidney transplant waiting lists is rapidly increasing, resulting in a growing gap between organ demand and the availability of kidneys for transplantation. This organ shortage has forced medical professionals to utilize marginal kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD) to broaden the donor pool and shorten wait times for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, recipients of ECD kidney grafts tend to have worse outcomes compared to those receiving organs from standard criteria donors (SCD), specifically increased risks of delayed graft function (DGF) and primary nonfunction incidence. Thus, representative methods for graft-quality assessment are strongly needed, especially for ECDs. Currently, graft-quality evaluation is limited to interpreting the donor’s recent laboratory tests, clinical risk scores, the visual evaluation of the organ, and, in some cases, a biopsy and perfusion parameters. The last few years have seen the emergence of many new technologies designed to examine organ function, including new imaging techniques, transcriptomics, genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, and new solutions in organ perfusion, which has enabled a deeper understanding of the complex mechanisms associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), inflammatory process, and graft rejection. This review summarizes and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of current conventional diagnostic methods and a wide range of new potential strategies (from the last five years) with respect to donor graft-quality assessment, the identification of IRI, perfusion control, and the prediction of DGF.

Highlights

  • Received: 13 December 2021Kidney transplantation (KTx) is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage renal dysfunction that is characterized by higher survival rates and greater quality of patient life compared to dialysis treatment [1]

  • Plasma; identified 42 transcripts associated with IFNγ signaling, which in allografts with delayed graft function (DGF) exhibited a greater magnitude of change in transcriptional amplitude and higher expression of noncoding

  • Omics technology, and perfusion methods have led to the development of a wide range of new tools and biomarkers that could be applied to evaluate graft quality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Received: 13 December 2021Kidney transplantation (KTx) is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage renal dysfunction that is characterized by higher survival rates and greater quality of patient life compared to dialysis treatment [1]. The number of patients placed on kidney transplant waiting lists is rapidly increasing, resulting in a growing gap between organ demand and the availability of kidneys for transplantation. Standard criteria donors (SCD) are preferred for kidney transplants because organs from these individuals typically result in more favourable outcomes compared to other donor types [2]. The shortage of available kidneys has forced medical professionals to utilize marginal kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD) to broaden the donor pool and shorten wait times for patients with end-stage renal disease. It is well known that donor organ quality affects long-term outcomes for renal transplant recipients, and ECD kidney grafts have been shown to have worse outcomes compared to SCD grafts, including an increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF) and primary nonfunction incidence (PNF) [2,3]. The surgeon decides whether to accept or decline a kidney based on their interpretation of the donor’s recent laboratory tests and a visual evaluation of the organ, with a biopsy being employed in some cases for direct tissue analysis [4,5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call