A Review of Berkeley's Theory of Vision, Designed to show the Unsoundness of that Celebrated Speculation, Samuel Bailey (James Ridgway, London, 1842. Pp. iv + 239. Out of print) Sight and Touch: An Attempt to Disprove the Received (or Berkeleian) Theory of Vision, Thomas K. Abbott. Illustrated with woodcuts. (Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, and Green, London, 1864. Pp. vi +

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessREVIEWSA Review of Berkeley's Theory of Vision, Designed to show the Unsoundness of that Celebrated Speculation, Samuel Bailey (James Ridgway, London, 1842. Pp. iv + 239. Out of print) Sight and Touch: An Attempt to Disprove the Received (or Berkeleian) Theory of Vision, Thomas K. Abbott. Illustrated with woodcuts. (Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, and Green, London, 1864. Pp. vi + 178. Out of print)J. O. WISDOMJ. O. WISDOM Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Volume 4, Number 13May 1953 Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Views: 2Total views on this site Views: 2Total views on this site Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/IV.13.88 Views: 2Total views on this site HistoryPublished online May 01, 1953 © 1953 by The Author. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.