Abstract

Reactive power spot markets have been proposed by many in the power engineering community as a means of reactive power compensation within the U.S. deregulated energy markets. Cited benefits include incentive for proper reactive power investment for power system stability, the minimization of costs to meet load, and proper reactive power price signals. However, the market power that can be exercised by utilities may render the market useless for consumer participants. In addition, the zero price of reactive power as well as the volatility in demand may not inspire the investment that spot markets are thought to encourage, and current methods of pricing reactive power involve time-consuming optimizations. An ACOPF simulation was run utilizing a representative urban transmission and distribution system, confirming many of the weaknesses theorized to exist in real time reactive power spot markets including exercise of market power and price volatility.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.