Abstract
Abstract Smilansky's four-stage classification scheme for play behavior has been used extensively both as a classification device, and as a hierarchical model which provides an index of a child's maturity. In this review, problems with the scheme as a classification device are first identified. The original category definitions are imprecise, and the categories are not sufficiently inclusive for the range of children's play behaviors. There are also difficulties in deciding when play is cosntructive or symbolic. The playful nature of constructive activity needs further consideration. Some ways of dealing with these problems are identified. The use of Smilansky's scheme as a hierarchical stage model is then considered. Such use is considered unjustified, given an examination of the origins of the scheme and from a review of recent empirical evidence. There is little to justify the assumption that constructive play is a less mature form of behavior than symbolic play. The general utility of classificatory s...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.