Abstract

Today's video surveillance systems are increasingly equipped with video content analysis for a great variety of applications. However, reliability and robustness of video content analysis algorithms remain an issue. They have to be measured against ground truth data in order to quantify the performance and advancements of new algorithms. Therefore, a variety of measures have been proposed in the literature, but there has neither been a systematic overview nor an evaluation of measures for specific video analysis tasks yet. This paper provides a systematic review of measures and compares their effectiveness for specific aspects, such as segmentation, tracking, and event detection. Focus is drawn on details like normalization issues, robustness, and representativeness. A software framework is introduced for continuously evaluating and documenting the performance of video surveillance systems. Based on many years of experience, a new set of representative measures is proposed as a fundamental part of an evaluation framework.

Highlights

  • The installation of videosurveillance systems is driven by the need to protect privateproperties, and by crime prevention, detection, and prosecution, for terrorism in public places

  • The background has to be completely stationary or moving globally. All these assumptions are violated in many real world scenarios, the tedious generation of ground truth (GT) becomes redundant

  • #TPc refers to the number of objects types classified correctly. #FNc is the number of false negatives caused by classification shortcomings, for example, unknown class, #FNc,det refers to the number of false negatives, caused by object detection errors or by classification shortcomings

Read more

Summary

A Review and Comparison of Measures for Automatic Video Surveillance Systems

Reliability and robustness of video content analysis algorithms remain an issue. They have to be measured against ground truth data in order to quantify the performance and advancements of new algorithms. A variety of measures have been proposed in the literature, but there has neither been a systematic overview nor an evaluation of measures for specific video analysis tasks yet. A software framework is introduced for continuously evaluating and documenting the performance of video surveillance systems. Based on many years of experience, a new set of representative measures is proposed as a fundamental part of an evaluation framework

INTRODUCTION
RELATED WORK
Evaluation without ground truth
Ground truth
File formats
Ground truth generation
Ground truth annotation tools
EVALUATION FRAMEWORK
System setup
Work flow
Measure tool
Preparation and presentation of results
METRICS
Basic notions and notations
Object matching
Object matching approach based on centroids
Object matching based on object area overlap
Segmentation measures
Chosen segmentation measure subset
Object detection measures
Object-counting approach
Object-matching approach
Chosen object detection measure subset
Object localization measures
Tracking measures
Track assignment based on trajectory matching
Result tracks
Track assignment based on frame-wise object matching
Chosen tracking measure subset
Event detection measures
Object classification measures
Chosen classification measure subset
4.10. Multicamera measures
4.11. The problem of averaging
4.11.1. Averaging within a frame
4.11.2. Averaging within a sequence
4.11.3. Averaging over a collection of sequences
EVALUATION
Selecting and prioritizing measures
Balancing of false and miss detections
Priority selection of measures
Sequence subsets for scenario evaluation
Performance profiles
Example 1: reading performance profiles
Example 2: comparing performance profiles
Automatic evaluation
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.