Abstract
ObjectivesFebrile infants younger than 3 months old present a diagnostic dilemma to the emergency physician. We aim to describe a large population of febrile infants less than 3 months old presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED) and to assess the performance of current heart rate guidelines in the prediction of serious infections (SI).Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective review of febrile infants younger than 3 months old, between March 2015 and Feb 2016, in a large tertiary pediatric ED. We documented the primary outcome of SI for each infant, as well as the clinical findings, vital signs, and Severity Index Score (SIS). We assessed the performance of the Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PaedCTAS), Advanced Pediatric Life Support (APLS) guidelines and Fleming normal reference values, using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).Results1057 infants were analyzed, with 326 (30.6%) infants diagnosed with SI. High temperature, tachycardia, and low SIS score were significantly associated with SI. Item analysis showed that the SIS performance was driven by the presence of mottling (p = 0.003) and high temperature (p<0.001). The APLS guideline had the highest sensitivity (66.0%, 95% CI 60.5–71.1%), NPV (73.3%, 95% CI 69.7–76.5%) and AUC (0.538), while the PaedCTAS (2 standard deviation from normal) had the highest specificity (98.5%, 95% CI 97.3–99.3%) and PPV (55.2%, 95% CI 32.7–71.0%).ConclusionsCurrent guidelines on infantile heart rates have a variable performance. In our study, the APLS heart rate guidelines performed with the highest sensitivity, but no individual guideline predicted for SIs satisfactorily.
Highlights
Febrile young infants younger than 3 months old present a diagnostic dilemma to the pediatric emergency department (ED) physician
The Advanced Pediatric Life Support (APLS) guideline had the highest sensitivity (66.0%, 95% CI 60.5– 71.1%), negative predictive value (NPV) (73.3%, 95% CI 69.7–76.5%) and area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) (0.538), while the PaedCTAS (2 standard deviation from normal) had the highest specificity (98.5%, 95% CI 97.3–99.3%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (55.2%, 95% CI 32.7–71.0%)
The APLS heart rate guidelines performed with the highest sensitivity, but no individual guideline predicted for serious infection (SI) satisfactorily
Summary
Febrile young infants younger than 3 months old present a diagnostic dilemma to the pediatric emergency department (ED) physician. Vital signs are of paramount importance in recognizing ill children and have been used in pediatric early warning system scores (PEWS) [9] and various triage systems [10]. Vital signs have resurfaced as the focus of research in recent years, with various groups purposing to update evidence-based normal heart rate ranges among children. We aim to (1) describe the presentation and outcomes of a large population of febrile young infants less than 3 months old presenting to a pediatric ED in an Asian city, and (2) assess the performance of the Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PaedCTAS) [10], the Advanced Pediatric Life Support (APLS) guidelines [11] and the Fleming normal reference values [12], in the prediction of SIs Vital signs have resurfaced as the focus of research in recent years, with various groups purposing to update evidence-based normal heart rate ranges among children. [11,12,13,14,15,16] Normative heart rate ranges are infamously difficult to define due to the hemodynamic lability in these young infants, multiple confounders for abnormal heart rate, and the variable physiological response during acute stress states.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.