A Retrospective Look on the Use of DNA Evidence in a Sexual Assault Investigation in the Philippines

Abstract

In 1998, biological samples were collected from the body of a 17-year old female rape-homicide victim within 24 hours post-contact. In the absence of a sexual assault investigation kit, locally available medical supplies were used to collect biological samples. The victim’s family filed a case naming the victim’s uncle as the assailant. More than a year into the trial, samples from the victim and the accused were tested for DNA. The vaginal smears yielded DNA profiles originating from at least two persons, with one DNA source being male. Upon discovery, the victim’s age, the state of her body, and medicolegal examination results supported the allegation of sexual assault rather than consensual sex. This paper described the DNA testing conducted for this rape with homicide case. The prosecution used the DNA test results to support the charges against the accused, who was eventually convicted and sentenced to death in 2001. Upon automatic review in 2004, the Philippine Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and dismissed the defense’s claim that DNA testing violated the defendant’s right against self-incrimination. The defendant’s death conviction was commuted to life imprisonment when the Death Penalty was suspended via Republic Act No. 9346 in 2006. The case described here is considered one of the DNA landmark cases cited in the Philippine Rule on DNA Evidence of 2007.