Abstract

Simple SummaryRapidly expanding global human population has led to increased supply chain demands on animal-based farming systems and the desire for environmentally friendly products. This has also resulted because of socio-political pressure and increased public concerns over the impacts of conventional agriculture on the environment. In order to be sustainable, animal production systems must also advance animal welfare, avoiding physically and psychologically stressful situations for the animals and apply innovative methods of reducing contribution of farming practices to global climate change while also functioning at optimum productivity. Consequently, to achieve a practical and effective improvement towards environmental sustainability, animal-based agriculture should consider animal welfare assessment, objective measures of physiological stress, climate change evaluation and animal productivity in a multi-dimensional and holistic approach.In this retrospective study, we conducted a desktop-based analysis of published literature using the ScienceDirect™ search engine to determine the proportion of livestock research within the last 7 years (2015–2021) that have applied animal welfare assessment combining objective measures of physiological stress and evaluation of climate change factors in order to provide an account of livestock productivity. From the search results, 563 published articles were reviewed. We found that the majority of the literature had discussed animal production outcomes (n = 491) and animal welfare (n = 453) either individually or in conjunction with another topic. The most popular occurrence was the combination of animal welfare assessment, objective measures of stress physiology and production outcomes discussed collectively (n = 218). We found that only 125 articles had discussed the impact of climate change (22.20%) on livestock production and/or vice versa. Furthermore, only 9.4% (n = 53) of articles had discussed all four factors and published research was skewed towards the dairy sector. Overall, this retrospective paper highlights that although research into animal welfare assessment, objective measures of stress and climate change has been applied across livestock production systems (monogastrics and ruminants), there remains a shortfall of investigation on how these key factors interact to influence livestock production. Furthermore, emerging technologies that can boost the quantitative evaluation of animal welfare are needed for both intensive and extensive production systems.

Highlights

  • Our retrospective analysis of the published literature using ScienceDirectTM search engine pertaining the use of the terms (Animal Welfare-AW, Stress-S, Animal ProductionAP and/or Climate Change-Climate change (CC)) indicates that in the last 7 years livestock researchers have mostly applied AP with AW and S while CC has been the least applied term used in published research

  • It is highly encouraging to know that researchers have applied key themes such as Animal Welfare, Stress and Animal Production in combination when studying their livestock animal system

  • This could possibly be an indicator of the increased public concerns regarding the animal welfare issues in livestock production, and this increased public awareness has increased governmental agencies to direct more funds and policy actions in support of animal welfare domains such as animal sentience

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prolonged droughts and natural disasters are two examples of extreme weather events induced by climate change, which threaten global agriculture [2]. A reduction in water availability and climatic variability threaten crop yield and impact on animal production [3]. Animal welfare can be defined as a state within the animal, what the animal is experiencing at any given time. It involves an integration of the biological responses elicited by an animal to their environment, and these responses can be indicated by changes in physiology, behaviour, health status, cognition and productive outputs [4,5].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.