Abstract

Study ObjectiveAlthough multiple hormonal treatment strategies are effective in decreasing heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in adolescents, few studies have compared the relative effectiveness of hormone therapy on the basis of dose. DesignRetrospective chart review SettingUrban tertiary care institution ParticipantsAdolescents aged 9–19 years with acute HMB and anemia in 2008–2018 InterventionsWe used billing codes to identify encounters for acute HMB with hemoglobin less than 12 mg/dl and reviewed initial treatment and time until resolution of acute HMB. We excluded patients who had previously used gonadal steroids or did not complete follow-up. We then compared patients who received combined oral ethinyl estradiol with progestin (EE/P) in standard dosing (EE ≤35 mcg/day) vs taper dosing (EE >35mcg/day in any step-down regimen). Main Outcome MeasuresTime until patient-reported resolution of acute HMB, measured in days from initial treatment ResultsOf 207 patients with vaginal bleeding and anemia, 90 met the criteria for review of therapy type and dose. Users of combined EE/P were hormone-naïve in 28/33 (84.8%) of those who initiated standard EE/P and 22/32 (68.8%) who initiated taper dosing. Bleeding duration was available for 15/28 (53.6%) and 18/22 (81.8%). Resolution of HMB occurred in 0–9 days with standard dosing (mean ±SD 2.1 ± 2.3 days) versus 1–15 days for taper dosing (4.9 ± 4.7; p = 0.04). Excluding six outliers of zero or more than 10 days, HMB ceased by 2.6 and 3 days (n = 12 and 15; p = 0.62). ConclusionCurrently recommended higher dose combined hormonal regimens do not appear to shorten the time to resolution of acute HMB in adolescents.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call