A retrospective comparison of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension versus sacrospinous fixation with transvaginal needle suspension for the management of vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy and Burch colposuspension with sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal needle suspension in the management of vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence. One hundred and seventeen women with vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence were surgically managed over a 7-year period. The first 61 consecutive women who underwent sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal needle suspension comprised the vaginal group, and the following 56 consecutive women who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy and Burch colposuspension comprised the abdominal group. Office records were reviewed to assess the presence of recurrent prolapse and urinary incontinence during postoperative follow-up. Objective follow-up was available for 101 women. Mean duration of follow-up was 24.0 +/- 15 months for the vaginal group, and 23.1 +/- 12.6 months for the abdominal group. The incidence of recurrent prolapse to or beyond the hymen (33% vs. 19%, P=0.0505) and lower urinary tract symptoms (26% vs. 13%, P = 0.0506) were significantly higher in the vaginal group than in the abdominal group. Our data suggest that the combined abdominal approach has a lower incidence of recurrent prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms than the combined vaginal approach in managing vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence.