Abstract

Objective: To review the management and outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy (ICP) in South Australia (SA) over the past decade. Design: Retrospective cohort review. Setting: Public clinics at two teaching hospitals in SA. Population: All pregnancies associated with ICP (defined as pruritus with serum bile acids≥10μmol/L) managed 2001–2010. Methods: Identification of subjects (laboratory database), detailed chart-review to ascertain demographics, maternal/perinatal outcomes and associated pregnancy comorbidities, analysis of mild/severe disease cohorts, comparison with normal population data, using Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate for continuous variables, and Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated in comparison with the general pregnant population for clinically significant outcomes. Results: 320 women (359 pregnancies) were diagnosed with ICP over the 10-years: incidence 0.6%/year. Within the cohort, the incidences of gestational diabetes (12.5%; OR 3.06, 95% CI 2.23–4.18), pre-eclampsia (10.3%; OR 75.84, 95% CI 52.91–178.70), and spontaneous preterm labour (23.1%; OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.41–2.98) were much higher than in the general SA pregnant population. Pregnancies with severe ICP (serum bile acids≥40μmol/L) had ICP diagnosed earlier (231 vs 248 days, P<0.001), and ended earlier (256 vs 260 days, P<0.001) with lower birthweights (2827g vs 3093g, P <0.001) than those with mild ICP. Neonates of severe ICP mothers were more likely to require special-care-nursery admission, but perinatal complication rates did not differ. There were no stillbirths. Conclusion: This large Australian retrospective cohort study confirms generally favourable outcomes associated with ICP, mild or severe, with no stillbirths, likely secondary to proactive medical management. A high proportion of pregnancies were also affected by gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, and/or spontaneous pre-term labour compared with the general population.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.