Abstract
Corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) has developed into a mature and popular approach to the study of text and talk. Yet researchers still need to face certain key methodological challenges every time they design a research project. These include: finding the right fit between the research question, data, method and theory; preventing analytical tools from dictating the research process; maintaining the distinction between quantitative and qualitative tools; ensuring that empirical claims are commensurate with the representativeness of the data; and avoiding the misinterpretation of findings. Although none of these challenges can be overcome entirely, significant benefits can be reaped from addressing them critically and self-reflectively.
Highlights
Corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) has developed into a mature and popular approach to the study of text and talk
It seems fair to say that twenty-odd years after it first appeared on the methodological fringe, corpus-assisted discourse studies, the field served by JCaDS, has gravitated towards the mainstream
Most researchers would probably be happy to go along with Partington (2010, p. 88), who describes corpus-assisted discourse studies as ‘the investigation and comparison of features of particular discourse types, integrating into the analysis, where appropriate, techniques and tools developed within corpus linguistics’
Summary
The launch of the Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies one year ago was not just a fresh departure and a sign of maturity and consolidation. From other fields (such as CDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, and ELF, English as a Lingua Franca), we know that the moment when an ‘approach’ — usually code for a combination of theory, method, and mindset — morphs into a handy acronym heralds the birth of a shared scholarly identity. Such an identity is a vehicle for teaming up with like-minded peers in order to muster increased momentum for research and to share ideas, data and tools. Before identifying what I consider to be five key challenges for researchers at the project design stage, I will examine why, in broad terms, fixing on a methodology can be so problematic for researchers of discourse — they may define it
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.