Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop a more reliable coding method of medical interviewing focused on data-gathering and emotion-handling. MethodsTwo trained (30h) undergraduates rated videotaped interviews from 127 resident-simulated patient (SP) interactions. Trained on 45 videotapes, raters coded 25 of 127 study set tapes for patient-centeredness. Guetzkow’s U, Cohen’s Kappa, and percent of agreement were used to measure raters’ reliability in unitizing and coding residents’ skills for eliciting: agenda (3 yes/no items), physical story (2), personal story (6), emotional story (15), using indirect skills (4), and general patient-centeredness (3). Results45 items were dichotomized from the earlier, Likert scale-based method and were reduced to 33 during training. Guetzkow’s U ranged from 0.00 to 0.087. Kappa ranged from 0.86 to 1.00 for the 6 variables and 33 individual items. The overall kappa was 0.90, and percent of agreement was 97.5%. Percent of agreement by item ranged from 84 to 100%. ConclusionsA simple, highly reliable coding method, weighted (by no. of items) to highlight personal elements of an interview, was developed and is recommended as a criterion standard research coding method. Practice implicationsAn easily conducted, reliable coding procedure can be the basis for everyday questionnaires like patient satisfaction with patient-centeredness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.