Abstract
Our institute has been using a pilot SIENET-PACS system for the last five years; its advantages and disadvantages in daily use are described. The SIENET system connects 2 CT, 3 MRT and 2 angiographic installations with 7 viewing consoles and with an optical archive. From January 1994 to 1997 approximately 19,000 patients were examined by CT and the results stored digitally in the PACS system. A representative analysis of selected patient data revealed problems in 12.8% of patients with regard to the radiological information system and also the hospital information system. While the digital data proved satisfactory, the production of digital images was excellent but time-consuming. The image archive was reliable but required greater capacity for our purposes. Manual retrieval of patient data presented problems and integration of the radiology information system and PADS is essential. Digital data gathering is an advantage. Digital imaging is too slow and should be improved by more suitable software. Integration of new archival storage methods and compatibility with the DICOM standard is, judging form our experience, essential.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
