Abstract
ABSTRACTStatistics were derived from casework from the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Latent Print Unit. These data represented a portion of the latent print casework completed in the 2003/2004 calendar years (N = 673 cases) and 2009/2010 calendar years (N = 885 cases). The 2003/2004 data revealed latent print recovery rates from various exhibits. Identifiable latent prints were recovered 13% of the time on firearms, 13% of the time on plastic bags, and no identifiable latent prints were recovered from fired or unfired ammunition. The processing of evidence prior to submission to the laboratory increased the chances of latent print recovery. Both data sets were explored for the rate at which identifiable latent prints were reported (61% of cases in 2003/2004 and 54% of cases in 2009/2010) and the rate at which identifiable latent prints were subsequently identified to an individual in the case (23% of cases in 2003/2004 and 25% of cases in 2009/2010). There was no noticeable difference for the ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.