A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty

Abstract

A retrospective gait analysis of patients with cemented Charnley-Mueller total hip arthroplasties was conducted to determine if functional differences exist between patients with femoral stems placed in varus and valgus orientations. Twenty patients and ten normals were studied using gait analysis to quantify joint motion and moments during level walking. In addition, a radiographic analysis of stem placement and mechanics of the reconstructed hip was performed on the total hip patients. All patients selected for the study had excellent clinical results on the basis of a score of 95 or better on the Harris hip rating form. The patients were divided into two subgroupings on the basis of stem orientation. A valgus group was defined as having a valgus stem orientation relative to the femoral shaft, with the femoral head-shaft offset shortened by 5 mm or greater compared to the contralateral unoperated hip, while the varus group was defined on the basis of having a varus stem orientation relative to the femoral shaft, with the femoral head-shaft offset restored to normal or greater than normal. A difference in gait was found between the varus and valgus patient groupings. The varus group had abnormal gait characteristics in the range of hip motion, the flexion-extension moments at the hip, and stride length. The patients in the valgus group had statistically normal gait. The differences in the gait characteristics were interpreted as an attempt to alter the forces on the hip joint for patients in the varus group. These alterations were possibly an early indication of a subtle adaptation in patients with varus-placed femoral stems since, historically, a greater percentage of the patients in this configuration, retrospectively, go on to mechanical failure. The results of this study suggest the potential use of gait analysis as a method of screening procedural or implant design changes in total joint arthroplasties. Retrospective clinical studies take a considerable amount of time before differences among design criteria or surgical procedures can be identified. Most design changes work well for the short term, and thus, a method of quantitatively separating designs, such as quantitative gait analysis, would be extremely useful in the evaluation of new procedures and designs.