Abstract

New data from FRB’s have provided an exciting new window on the cosmos. For the first time we have both Dispersion Measure (DM) from distant sources and their red-shift. This gives us the opportunity to determine the average electron number density in intergalactic space and thus test New Tired Light predictions. Here, in an alternative cosmology, the universe is static and redshifts are produced by an interaction between photons and the electrons in the intergalactic medium. In a paper published in summer 2006 New Tired Light (NTL) predicted an average electron number density of n = 0.5 m-3. In 2016 a paper was published reporting that for the first time the DM of a FRB and the redshift of the host galaxy had been found. Using standard physics this confirmed the electron number density as n = 0.5 m-3. The prediction NTL made ten years earlier was proved to be correct. Using this measured electron number density enabled a definitive value of the Hubble constant to be made by New Tired Light and the value is 63 km/s per Mpc which compares well with currently accepted values. Importantly, since in NTL the redshift and dispersion are both due to the electrons in IG space, a relationship between DM’s and redshift can be predicted. NTL predicts that DM and LN(1 + z) will be directly proportional and related by the formula DM = mec/2hre(3.086 × 1022) where me, re are the rest mass and classical radius of the electron, c is the speed of light in a vacuum and h is the plank constant. The numerical term is to change units from pccm-3 to m-2. This reduces to DM = 2380LN(1 + z). Using data from five FRB’s this is tested and a linear relation is seen of the form DM = 1830LN(1 + z). The gradient of the plot from the observed data is within 23% of that predicted by NTL. Recently the Tolman Surface Brightness test has been applied to the HUDF and the results support a static universe whilst the possibility of two differing types of SN Ia whose distribution changes with distances means that tired light models can no longer be ruled out. Using SDF we know the distance to the Atlia galaxy cluster as 1.26 × 1024 m. With the average electron number density of n = 0.5 m-3 found from the Dispersion Measures of the FRB’s, from first principles, New Tired Light gives a calculated predicted redshift of 0.0086. This compares well with the value found spectroscopically of 0.0087—a difference of approximately 1%. It is shown that if the energy transferred to a recoiling electron when a UV photon of wavelength λ = 5 × 10-8 m interacts with it is emitted as a secondary photon that photon will have a wavelength of 2.2 mm— the wavelength at which the CMB curve peaks.

Highlights

  • The New Tired Light Theory (NTL) was first published in a peer reviewed journal in the summer of 2006 [1]

  • If dispersion is an effect of a photon electron interaction whilst redshift, in mainstream cosmology, is an effect due to the stretching of space there may well be some qualitative agreement between the two but here we have the same linear graph and the gradient of the observed Dispersion Measure (DM)’s within 23% of that predicted by NTL

  • What of New Tired Light? It predicted in a peer reviewed journal that the average electron number density in intergalactic space would be 0.5 m−3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The New Tired Light Theory (NTL) was first published in a peer reviewed journal in the summer of 2006 [1]. A prediction was made that in order for the NTL to give the correct value for the Hubble constant, the average electron number density, ne in intergalactic space would be ne = 0.5 m−3. With input values of H0 = 69.6 ± 1 km/s per Mpc, Omega M = 0.286, Omegavac = 0.714 and the redshift z = 0.492 ± 0.008. From this the light travel time is: 5.035 ± 0.09 Gyr, or a distance of 1.543 ± 0.03 Gyr. From this the light travel time is: 5.035 ± 0.09 Gyr, or a distance of 1.543 ± 0.03 Gyr This leads to an average electron number density, ne of 0.5 electrons per cubic metre.

Predicting a Relationship between z and DM by NTL
Tests to Distinguish between Static and Expanding Models of the Universe
Tolman Surface Brightness Test
Supernovae Light Curves
Predicting Redshift from First Principles
Discussion
The Hubble Constant
Findings
The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call