Abstract
Thomas and Stryckman wrote a sweeping critique, and two of their points could be particularly damaging to the substance of my text, should they be proven correct. First, they submit that researchers in social gerontology have not produced that many overviews, and in their second point, they contend that I reduce the logic of the scientific approach to mathematical formalization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
