Abstract
This paper explores the process of reframing within strategic, Milan and analytic therapy. There are two purposes in exploring the different frameworks – the first is to clarify the differences in each framework; the second is to examine reframing as a generic process in therapy. In the course of the discussion, some common themes emerge. These include the question of the client's experience of therapy, the tendency to depersonalize the process of reframing, and the issue of truth in relation to reframing. Throughout the paper, there is an attempt to avoid the tendency in family therapy to treat difference competitively.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
