Abstract

Sampling-based PLLs have become a new research trend due to the possibility of removing the frequency divider (FDIV) from the feedback path, where the FDIV increases the contribution of in-band noise by the factor of dividing ratio square (N2). Between two possible sampling methods, sub-sampling and reference-sampling, the latter provides a relatively wide locking range, as the slower input reference signal is sampled with the faster VCO output signal. However, removal of FDIV makes the PLL not feasible to implement fractional-N operation based on varying divider ratios through random sequence generators, such as a Delta-Sigma-Modulator (DSM). To address the above design challenges, we propose a reference-sampling-based calibration-free fractional-N PLL (RSFPLL) with a phase-interpolator-linked sampling clock generator (PSCG). The proposed RSFPLL achieves fractional-N operations through phase-interpolator (PI)-based multi-phase generation instead of a typical frequency divider or digital-to-time converter (DTC). In addition, to alleviate the power burden arising from VCO-rated sampling, a flexible mask window generation method has been used that only passes a few sampling clocks near the point of interest. The prototype PLL system is designed with a 65 nm CMOS process with a chip size of 0.42 mm2. It achieves 322 fs rms jitter, −240.7 dB figure-of-merit (FoM), and −44.06 dBc fractional spurs with 8.17 mW power consumption.

Highlights

  • Communication-based industries such as home IoT, 5G communications, autonomous vehicles, and mobile high-speed interfaces are growing rapidly [1,2,3,4]

  • A basic block diagram of the classical charging pump Phase locked loop (PLL) (CPLL) is shown in Figure 1a, where the frequency of the VCO output signal varies with the change in the dividing ratio (N) along the feedback path

  • Even though our proposal refers to the basic structure of reference-sampling PLLs (RSPLLs), it would be beneficial to introduce the various sub-sampling PLLs (SSPLLs) and RSPLL types, and the circuit techniques used for each PLL in the succeeding chapter, to help in understanding the details used in our design

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Communication-based industries such as home IoT, 5G communications, autonomous vehicles, and mobile high-speed interfaces are growing rapidly [1,2,3,4]. If N is an integer, the output frequency is an integer multiple of the input signal, called an integer-N PLL Even though it has versatile usage, the output signal is only changed by an integer multiple of the REF signal, which is sometimes not acceptable for certain applications that require high-frequency resolution. Even with an enhanced frequency resolution from the fractional-N PLL structure, one of the disadvantages of classical PLLs is that the in-band noise of this type of PLL is increasing by the factor of dividing ratio square (N2 ) [5,6,7,8] These disadvantages push the research community to consider a different phase-frequency comparison method based on sampling, i.e., without using FDIV units. Even though our proposal refers to the basic structure of RSPLL, it would be beneficial to introduce the various SSPLL and RSPLL types, and the circuit techniques used for each PLL in the succeeding chapter, to help in understanding the details used in our design

Sub-Sampling PLL and Reference-Sampling PLL
Architecture Overview
Pipelined Phase-Interpolator with Constant Charge Technique
Reference-Sampling Phase Detector and VCO
Noise Analysis
Measurement
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call