Abstract
Face-to-face conversations are central to human communication and a fascinating example of joint action. Beyond verbal content, one of the primary ways in which information is conveyed in conversations is body language. Body motion in natural conversations has been difficult to study precisely due to the large number of coordinates at play. There is need for fresh approaches to analyze and understand the data, in order to ask whether dyads show basic building blocks of coupled motion. Here we present a method for analyzing body motion during joint action using depth-sensing cameras, and use it to analyze a sample of scientific conversations. Our method consists of three steps: defining modes of body motion of individual participants, defining dyadic modes made of combinations of these individual modes, and lastly defining motion motifs as dyadic modes that occur significantly more often than expected given the single-person motion statistics. As a proof-of-concept, we analyze the motion of 12 dyads of scientists measured using two Microsoft Kinect cameras. In our sample, we find that out of many possible modes, only two were motion motifs: synchronized parallel torso motion in which the participants swayed from side to side in sync, and still segments where neither person moved. We find evidence of dyad individuality in the use of motion modes. For a randomly selected subset of 5 dyads, this individuality was maintained for at least 6 months. The present approach to simplify complex motion data and to define motion motifs may be used to understand other joint tasks and interactions. The analysis tools developed here and the motion dataset are publicly available.
Highlights
IntroductionDuring joint action people move in complex and coordinated ways to achieve shared goals [1, 2]
Understanding joint human action is of great interest
Steps: defining individual modes, defining dyadic modes made of combinations of these individual modes, and defining motion motifs which are dyadic modes that occur more often than chance
Summary
During joint action people move in complex and coordinated ways to achieve shared goals [1, 2]. Joint action [3, 4] has been mostly studied in the context of defined laboratory tasks, designed to reduce the motion to one or a few degrees of freedom which can be fruitfully analyzed [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Joint action in natural settings involves tens of three-dimensional degrees of freedom per person. To deal with such complexities, studying joint action in naturalistic settings requires new PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170786. To deal with such complexities, studying joint action in naturalistic settings requires new PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170786 January 31, 2017
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.