Abstract

To better understand barriers and facilitators that contribute to antibiotic overuse in long-term care and to use this information to inform an evidence and theory-informed program. Information on barriers and facilitators associated with the assessment and management of urinary tract infections were identified from a mixed-methods survey and from focus groups with stakeholders working in long-term care. Each barrier or facilitator was mapped to corresponding determinants of behavior change, as described by the theoretical domains framework (TDF). The Rx for Change database was used to identify strategies to address the key determinants of behavior change. In total, 19 distinct barriers and facilitators were mapped to 8 domains from the TDF: knowledge, skills, environmental context and resources, professional role or identity, beliefs about consequences, social influences, emotions, and reinforcements. The assessment of barriers and facilitators informed the need for a multifaceted approach with the inclusion of strategies (1) to establish buy-in for the changes; (2) to align organizational policies and procedures; (3) to provide education and ongoing coaching support to staff; (4) to provide information and education to residents and families; (5) to establish process surveillance with feedback to staff; and (6) to deliver reminders. The use of a stepped approach was valuable to ensure that locally relevant barriers and facilitators to practice change were addressed in the development of a regional program to help long-term care facilities minimize antibiotic prescribing for asymptomatic bacteriuria. This stepped approach provides considerable opportunity to advance the design and impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Highlights

  • 381 responses were captured from the online survey representing multiple different positions in the long-term care facilities (LTCFs): administrators and directors or associate directors of care (50%); registered nurses and registered practical nurses (12.3%); nurse practitioners, physicians and medical directors (3.7%); infection control practitioners (15.2%); and other (18.4%)

  • Coaching was added for LTCFs to address challenges in reaching all staff when delivering formal education sessions to provide reassurance and support for more difficult cases, and to monitor practice improvements

  • Champions were added to encourage LTCFs to select an individual dedicated to leading the overall implementation of the program and who could strengthen buy-in and overcome challenges as they emerge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Local opinion leaders have access to a range of for the practice changes program resources

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call