A real-world, patient-reported outcomes study in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer receiving long-term maintenance therapy with niraparib.

Abstract

e23164 Background: Niraparib has been approved for the maintenance treatment of newly diagnosed advanced and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSR OC). The phase 3 PRIMA and NOVA studies showed that maintenance niraparib did not worsen quality of life (QoL) compared with placebo. However, no QoL data have been reported for Asian OC patients treated with niraparib. Here, we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for PSR OC patients who received niraparib as maintenance therapy for more than two years in a real-world setting. Methods: This prospective, real-world study included OC patients participating in the Niraparib Patient Assistance Program (PAP) in China (NCT06037213). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed PSR epithelial OC, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, had been maintained on niraparib for more than two years without disease progression and were still receiving niraparib within 28 days. PROs were assessed every 4-6 weeks for three times using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the FOSI. In addition, a 6-question niraparib medication questionnaire including starting dose, adaptive dose, dose adjustments and reasons, missed doses, concomitant medications was administered at baseline. Results: The PAP enrolled 3154 PSR OC patients, 1151 had been on niraparib for more than two years and could be followed up. From August 2023 to January 2024, 604 eligible patients were recruited and completed at least one assessment. The median age was 58 years (range, 27-82 years). The median duration of treatment with niraparib was 34.8 months (range, 30.5-46.7 months). Among 445 patients with BRCAm status, 104 were BRCAm (23.4%) and 341 were BRCAwt (76.6%). A total of 491 patients (81.3%) received niraparib 200 mg as a starting dose, while 107 (17.7%) required dose adjustments in clinical practice. Presently, 503 (83.3%) were on 200mg. 523 (86.6%) were compliant with the daily oral dose of niraparib, without missing any doses in the previous 6 months. 193 patients (32.0%) had common chronic disease, and 176 (29.1%) were taking concomitant medications during maintenance. The EQ-5D-5L HUI and VAS scores remained stable across the three assessments. The baseline mean EQ-5D-5L HUI and VAS scores were 0.98 (SD 0.05) and 84.31 (SD 10.50), respectively, and the least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline to the third assessment were -0.004 (SE 0.001) and -0.609 (SE 0.248), respectively. A similar situation was observed for the FOSI score. The baseline mean FOSI score was 31.13 (SD 1.37), and the LS mean change from baseline to the third assessment was -0.359 (SE 0.033). Conclusions: In the real world, patients with PSR OC who underwent long-term maintenance treatment with niraparib exhibited a consistently stable QoL. This finding highlights the significant clinical value of niraparib in maintaining QoL in these populations.