Abstract
Simple SummaryNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases, with few patients carrying driver mutations in the gene encoding for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Advances in translational research have established EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as the standard first-line therapy for NSCLC patients with activating EGFR mutations. The aim of our observational study was to assess the frequency of T790M acquired resistance and predictors of its presence, in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have progressed in the first-line EGFR-TKI treatment setting with first- or second-generation TKIs and have undergone molecular testing in tissue and/or plasma biopsy. The study highlights the challenges of performing tissue re-biopsy in routine care settings, which can lead to patients considered non-eligible for certain therapies from which they can benefit, and merits further actions from the healthcare community, in order to establish re-biopsy as a standard procedure.Background: Real-world data on the molecular epidemiology of EGFR resistance mutations at or after progression with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC are lacking. Methods: This ongoing observational study was carried out by 23 hospital-based physicians in Greece. The decision to perform cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 in tissue and/or plasma at disease progression was made before enrollment. For patients with negative/inconclusive T790M plasma-based results, tissue re-biopsy could be performed. Results: Ninety-six (96) eligible patients were consecutively enrolled (median age: 67.8 years) between July-2017 and September-2019. Of the patients, 98% were tested upon progression using plasma and 2% using tissue/cytology biopsy. The T790M mutation was detected in 16.0% of liquid biopsies. Tissue re-biopsy was performed in 22.8% of patients with a T790M-negative plasma result. In total, the T790M positivity rate was 21.9%, not differing between patients on first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. Higher (≥2) ECOG performance status and longer (≥10 months) time to disease progression following EGFR-TKI treatment initiation were associated with T790M positivity. Conclusions: Results from plasma/tissue-cytology samples in a real-world setting, yielded a T790M positivity rate lower than previous reports. Fewer than one in four patients with negative plasma-based testing underwent tissue re-biopsy, indicating the challenges in routine care settings.
Highlights
In 2018, tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer ranked as the leading cause of cancerrelated deaths worldwide and in Greece, a country which ranked fourth among 185 countries in terms of age-standardized incidence rate of lung cancer (40.5 per 100,000) [1,2].Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases, with few patients carrying driver mutations in the gene encoding for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [3]
The primary objective of the study was to assess the frequency of the T790M mutation, using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 at the time of progression on or after first-line first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy
The ‘LUNGFUL’ study provides real-world evidence from routine care clinical settings in Greece on the frequency of EGFR mutations, focusing on T790M, in patients with EGFRmutated advanced NSCLC who have progressed in the first-line EGFR-TKI (1st or 2nd generation) treatment setting
Summary
In 2018, tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer ranked as the leading cause of cancerrelated deaths worldwide and in Greece, a country which ranked fourth among 185 countries in terms of age-standardized incidence rate of lung cancer (40.5 per 100,000) [1,2].Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases, with few patients carrying driver mutations in the gene encoding for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [3]. During the recruitment period of this study, as osimertinib was not available as 1st line treatment, except for patients harboring the de novo T790M point mutation, there was no general consensus for a preference of any of the available first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in the first-line setting [3]. In the randomized phase IIB LUX-Lung 7 trial, similar overall survival (OS) but significantly better objective response rates (ORR)and progression-free survival (PFS) were reported for the second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib versus the first-generation gefitinib [10,11]. In the randomized phase III ARCHER 1050 trial, the second-generation TKI dacomitinib (not available in Greece) was shown to significantly improve PFS over the first-generation EGFR-TKI, gefitinib [12,13]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.