A Real-World Analysis of the Use of Systemic Therapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma and the Differential Impacts on Overall Survival by Practice Pattern

Abstract

IntroductionMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy that affects older adults with frequent comorbidities, making real-world treatment decisions challenging. This study compares the overall survival (OS) of patients with MPM by physician’s choice of first-line (1L) platinum chemotherapy (PC), second-line (2L) immunotherapy versus chemotherapy, and by receipt of maintenance therapy (MT). MethodsThe study included patients diagnosed with advanced MPM in the Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived database who initiated PC with pemetrexed in the 1L setting between 2011 and 2019. Patients in the 2L therapy analysis received single-agent chemotherapy versus immunotherapy after the progression of disease from our 1L cohort. Patients in the MT cohort were identified on the basis of continued receipt of pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab after dropping PC at prespecified intervals. The OS of patients by choice of 1L PC, 2L immunotherapy versus chemotherapy, and receipt of MT was summarized by means of Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and compared in the context of propensity score matching weighted analyses. ResultsIn propensity score matching weighting analysis from 2065 patients with MPM, there was no evidence of an OS difference by choice of 1L PC (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–1.31, p = 0.43), suggestive evidence of an OS difference by choice of 2L immunotherapy versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.42–1.08; p = 0.10), and no evidence of an OS difference by receipt of MT (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72–1.16, p = 0.46). ConclusionsUsing real-world, propensity score–matched weighted analysis of MPM, we found there was no difference in OS by choice of 1L PC, 2L immunotherapy or chemotherapy, or by receipt of MT.