Abstract

Radio One's Reads, which aims to select a work of Canadian literature all of Canada should read together, was first broadcast as a network special in 2002. This essay undertakes an ideological analysis of the cultural work that performs, focussing on the first three series and drawing upon original interviews with the show's producers, listeners, and cultural workers. authors conceptualize the show as both a mass reading event and a media spectacle that reinforces the blockbuster of contemporary Canadian literary publishing. They also contend that the model of nation imagined by the content of is problematically, if predictably, conservative (bilingual and uncritically multicultural); however, the authors position this ideological limitation against the potential for creative resistance produced by the show's multiple modes of delivery. L'emission de Radio One intitulee Canada Reads qui choisit une oeuvre litteraire canadienne « que tout le Canada devrait lire ensemble » a ete diffusee pour la premiere fois lors d'un special du Reseau en 2002. Le present article effectue une analyse ideologique des oeuvres culturelles choisies pour l'emission en mettant l'accent sur les trois premieres series et en se servant d'entrevues originales avec les realisateurs de l'emission, les auditeurs et les agents culturels. Les auteures conceptualisent l'emission comme un evenement de lecture de masse et un spectacle mediatique renforcant la « culture de superproduction » de la publication litteraire canadienne contemporaine. Les auteures avancent que le modele de nation qui est « imagine » par le contenu de l'emission est problematiquement, mais de facon previsible, conservateur (bilingue et aisement multiculturel). Toutefois, les auteures placent cette limite ideologique dans le contexte d'une resistance creatrice possible causee par les divers modes de delivrance de l'emission. CBC Radio is a great literary patron and sometimes has (quasi-) original ideas. (Richler 2002, RA4) Ungrateful listeners have criticized the CBC's Canada Reads campaign.... Isn't it somewhat totalitarian to urge everyone in the country to read the same book, even if the book is as good as Michael Ondaatje's In the Skin of a Lion? (Gordon 2002, A18) The jury's choice of an essentially unreadable novel arose partly from the ambiguity of the job. They were not to pick the best book, but the book Canada should read-an opening that gave free rein to CanCult's ingrained nannyism. (Bethune 2003, 52) Like many One Book pseudo-communities, the also provided the requisite illusion of public participation in the form of a people's ballot... a patronizing top-down process leads us to supposedly morally edifying books that are already quite popular. (Niedzviecki 2002, 16) What cultural work does Radio One's perform-and for whom? Does it uphold the symbolic power of the and reinforce its explicit ideological imperatives as a public broadcaster to educate, inform, and represent Canadians? Or, does represent a reimagining of Radio's national community and the corporation's role within the field of Canadian culture? responses quoted above represent the complex, and often conflicting, attitudes articulated by media commentators and arts critics writing for national print publications. These writers alternately question or reinforce the CBC's cultural authority as an arbiter of literary quality, as a promoter of Canadian literature, and as a nation-building institution. Their comments underline the corporation's ideological and structural position within the ruling relations of power' and trouble the CBC's relationship to its audience, in particular to readers of literary fiction. is an annual program that first aired in April 2002, and that aims to get Canadians across the country to read the same book: it has been described as an attempt to create a huge trans-Canadian book club. …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.