Abstract

In order to better understand some of the factors likely to affect measurements of KC1 extractable acidity, experiments were conducted using synthetic solutions and extracts from a wide range of contrasting soils. The reagents used for measuring exchangeable acidity (i.e., KC1 and KF) were also examined to evaluate the effects of chemical impurities on acidity measurements. Two commonly used titrimetric methods were adapted and tested to determine the accuracy and precision of acidity measurements. The exchangeable acidity of soil extracts was investigated by extraction methods, extractant concentration, and extractant volume. Results from the soil extract experiments indicated that continuous shaking has no significant effect on acidity measurements. Filtration, however, is critical, especially for acidic organic‐rich soils, since aluminum (Al) ions can be lost during centrifugation. Extractant concentration and volume had variable effects on the acidity measurements for individual soils. In general, the modified Yuan's method is preferable to the modified Thomas’ method for estimating exchangeable Al. To ensure successful determination of exchangeable acidity, we recommend using a wider KCl:soil ratio (>15:1, v/w) for organic soils with low base saturation and allophanic Andisols. In sum, potassium chloride and potassium fluoride extraction for estimating exchangeable acidity is applicable for most soils.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.