Abstract
The mid-Cretaceous of North America and Europe has long been noted for the absence of sauropod dinosaurs, leading several authors to suggest that this depauperate interval is a consequence of an end-Albian sauropod extinction. This time period has become known as the ‘mid-Cretaceous sauropod hiatus’, with the subsequent presence of titanosaurian sauropods in the latest Cretaceous of North America and Europe interpreted as the result of dispersal of taxa from South America and Africa, respectively. However, several lines of evidence indicate that this hiatus is probably a sampling artefact. New fossil and trackway discoveries have considerably shortened the hiatus, reducing it to the Turonian–early Campanian in North America, and to just two short intervals in the late Cenomanian–early Turonian and late Coniacian–Santonian of Europe. Palaeoenvironmental analyses of sauropods demonstrate an inland terrestrial preference for titanosaurs, the dominant Late Cretaceous sauropods; however, during the hiatus there was a decline in inland deposits and increase in coastal sediments in Europe and North America, which would have greatly reduced the probability of preserving titanosaurs. Neither the decline in inland deposits, nor the ‘sauropod hiatus’, occurred elsewhere in the world. Statistical comparisons also demonstrate a significant positive correlation between fluctuations in inland deposits and sauropod occurrences during the mid–Late Cretaceous in Europe and North and South America. Lastly, cladistic analyses do not place latest Cretaceous North American and European titanosaurs within South American and African clades, contradicting the predictions of the ‘austral immigrant’ hypothesis. The latter hypothesis also receives little support from biogeographical analysis of dispersal among titanosaurs. Thus, the ‘sauropod hiatus’ of North America and Europe is most plausibly interpreted as the product of a sampling bias pertaining to the rarity of inland sediments and dominance of coastal deposits preserved in these two regions during the mid-Cretaceous. The presence of titanosaurs in these areas during the latest Cretaceous can be explained by dispersal from Southern Hemisphere continents, but this is no more probable than descent from Early Cretaceous incumbent faunas or dispersal from Asia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.