Abstract
ABSTRACT Recently, a study (H&T in this work) compared the pitch angle measurements of several methods on toy spiral galaxies. They claimed that their method outperformed the other methods. In particular, they claimed that our method, SpArcFiRe, either failed completely or produced erroneous results on many of their toy galaxies. In this paper, we assess the validity of that claim with respect to: (1) their toy models as realistic approximations of galaxies, and (2) the handling of SpArcFiRe’s parameters to correctly trace the arms of the toy galaxies. We demonstrate that the structure displayed in their toy galaxies deviates significantly from those of real galaxies. Given that SpArcFiRe was designed for and tested against hundreds of thousands of images of real galaxies, SpArcFiRe could not have been expected to work well with default parameters on H&T’s unrealistic toy galaxies. We then review the parameters that affected SpArcFiRe’s ability to measure pitch angles in the toy galaxies, and show that with minor parameter adjustments, SpArcFiRe easily measures the pitch angles of the toy galaxies with mean error less than 1° and maximum error less than 4°, completely eliminating the failures and outliers discussed by H&T.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
