A randomized phase Ib/II study of niraparib (nira) plus nivolumab (nivo) or ipilimumab (ipi) in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive advanced pancreatic cancer (aPDAC).

Abstract

4021 Background: Establishing alternatives to perpetual chemotherapy for pts with aPDAC has been proposed to address inevitable chemotherapy resistance and cumulative toxicity. Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown clinical efficacy in this setting, and preclinical data suggest that the addition of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) may offer synergistic tumor control. We performed a randomized, phase Ib/II study of nira plus anti-PD-1 (nivo) or nira plus anti-CTLA-4 (ipi) maintenance for pts with aPDAC who had not progressed after >4 mo of platinum-based therapy. Methods: After discontinuation of chemotherapy, pts were randomized 1:1 to nira 200mg PO daily plus either nivo 240mg IV q2 weeks (later amended to 480mg IV q4 weeks) or ipi 3mg/kg IV q3 weeks for four doses. Nira could be escalated to 300mg PO daily if tolerated. Pts were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression free survival at six months (PFS6) in each arm. Secondary endpoints included safety, OS, ORR, and outcomes by DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiencies. Pts were evaluable for safety if they had received > 1 dose of study treatment and for efficacy if they had also received > 1 follow-up imaging study. Based on historical data, the null hypothesis of PFS6 = 44% vs a 2-sided alternative hypothesis of PFS ≠ 44% was tested. 42 pts per arm provided 81% power for testing at a 5% significance level to detect inferior PFS6 < 27% or superior PFS6 > 61%. Results: As of Oct 2021, 91 pts were enrolled, of whom 84 were evaluable for efficacy (44 nira/nivo; 40 nira/ipi). The median potential follow-up was 23 mos. Most common treatment-related AEs were nira/nivo: thrombocytopenia (28%), arthralgia (25%), nausea (23%), and fatigue (23%) and nira/ipi: thrombocytopenia (45%), anemia (43%), fatigue (43%), nausea, (41%), AST increase (36%), rash (34%) and ALT increase (29%). 88% of AEs were grade 1-2. Efficacy results were: nira/nivo: PFS6 20.6% (95% CI 8.3-32.9, p = 0.0002), mPFS 1.9 mo and nira/ipi: PFS6 59.6% (95% CI 44.3-74.9, p = 0.045), mPFS 8.1 mo. Fifteen pts (8 nira/nivo; 7 nira/ipi) had pathogenic variants in BRCA or PALB2 . Excluding these: mPFS on nira/nivo was 1.9 mo (95% CI 1.8-1.9) and mPFS on nira/ipi was 7.6 mo (95% CI 4.0 – 11.1). Conclusions: In a randomized phase 1B/II study, nira/ipi as maintenance therapy met the primary endpoint of superior PFS6 while nira/nivo yielded inferior PFS6 for pts with aPDAC who had not progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The benefit of nira/ipi maintenance persisted in pts without known DDR variants. Clinical trial information: NCT03404960. [Table: see text]