Abstract

BackgroundDuring the preschool years, children’s development of skills like language and communication, executive functions, and socioemotional comprehension undergo dramatic development. Still, our knowledge of how these skills are enhanced is limited. The preschool contexts constitute a well-suited arena for investigating these skills and hold the potential for giving children an equal opportunity preparing for the school years to come. The present study compared two pedagogical methods in the Swedish preschool context as to their effect on language and communication, executive functions, socioemotional comprehension, and early math. The study targeted children in the age span four-to-six-year-old, with an additional focus on these children’s backgrounds in terms of socioeconomic status, age, gender, number of languages, time spent at preschool, and preschool start. An additional goal of the study was to add to prior research by aiming at disentangling the relationship between the investigated variables.MethodThe study constitutes a randomized controlled trial including 18 preschools and 29 preschool units, with a total of 431 children, and 98 teachers. The interventions lasted for 6 weeks, preceded by pre-testing and followed by post-testing of the children. Randomization was conducted on the level of preschool unit, to either of the two interventions or to control. The interventions consisted of a socioemotional and material learning paradigm (SEMLA) and a digitally implemented attention and math training paradigm (DIL). The preschools were further evaluated with ECERS-3. The main analysis was a series of univariate mixed regression models, where the nested structure of individuals, preschool units and preschools were modeled using random variables.ResultsThe result of the intervention shows that neither of the two intervention paradigms had measurable effects on the targeted skills. However, there were results as to the follow-up questions, such as executive functions predicting all other variables (language and communication, socioemotional comprehension, and math). Background variables were related to each other in patterns congruent with earlier findings, such as socioeconomic status predicting outcome measures across the board. The results are discussed in relation to intervention fidelity, length of intervention, preschool quality, and the impact of background variables on children’s developmental trajectories and life prospects.

Highlights

  • During the preschool years, children’s development of skills like language and communication, executive functions, and socioemotional comprehension undergo dramatic development

  • In an Randomised controlled trial (RCT) study of 759 preschool children, Blair and Raver [13] concluded that did the intervention have an effect on the targeted ability self-regulation, but the children improved in mathematics, reading and vocabulary with results increasing into first grade

  • Background variables The information gathered through questionnaires delivered to the parents consisted of the following information: socioeconomic status (SES), estimated on the bases of both caretakers’ income and educational level9; the Swedish Communicative Development Inventory [72, 116]; age measured in months, as well as age at preschool start and number of hours per week spent at preschool at the time of the intervention; sex, which was included as a variable based on prior research in various areas [44, 76, 79, 117, 118]; second languages spoken and information on the child’s strongest language; information on developmental disorders and family history of language disorders; and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), [119,120,121]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Children’s development of skills like language and communication, executive functions, and socioemotional comprehension undergo dramatic development. The information gathered through questionnaires delivered to the parents consisted of the following information: socioeconomic status (SES), estimated (if possible) on the bases of both caretakers’ income and educational level; the Swedish Communicative Development Inventory [72, 116]; age measured in months, as well as age at preschool start and number of hours per week spent at preschool at the time of the intervention; sex, which was included as a variable based on prior research in various areas [44, 76, 79, 117, 118]; second languages spoken and information on the child’s strongest language; information on developmental disorders and family history of language disorders; and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), [119,120,121].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.