Abstract

In a multicenter, randomized trial, we investigated whether the long half-time dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine was more efficacious than the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of nifedipine in lowering ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in sustained hypertension (clinic systolic/diastolic BP 140-179/90-109mmHg and 24-hour systolic/diastolic BP≥130/80mmHg). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine 5-10mg/day or nifedipine-GITS 30-60mg/day. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed for 24hours at baseline and 4-week treatment and for 48hours at 8-week treatment with a dose of medication missed on the second day. After 8-week treatment, BP was similarly reduced in the amlodipine (n=257) and nifedipine-GITS groups (n=248) for both clinic and ambulatory (24-hour systolic/diastolic BP10.3/6.5 vs 10.9/6.3mmHg, P≥0.24) measurements. However, after missing a dose of medication, ambulatory BP reductions were greater in the amlodipine than nifedipine-GITS group, with a significant (P≤0.04) between-group difference in 24-hour (-1.2mmHg) and daytime diastolic BP (-1.5mmHg). In conclusion, amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS were efficacious in reducing 24-hour BP. When a dose of medication was missed, amlodipine became more efficacious than nifedipine-GITS.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.