Abstract

Lactating cows are routinely treated at dry-off with antibiotic infusions in each quarter for the cure and prevention of pathogenic intramammary infection, which remains the most common disease in dairy herds. This approach is known as blanket dry-cow therapy, usually effective for the prevention and cure of infections, but has been shown to potentially contribute to the emergence and spreading of antibiotic resistant bacterial strains. Exploring the use of non-antibiotic treatments coupled with selective dry-cow therapy is necessary to reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance and potential interference with milk microbiome balance. The impact of selective dry-cow therapy on the physiological milk microbiome needs to be carefully evaluated. In this small-scale trial, five healthy (no mastits, SCC <200,000 cells mL−1) second-parity cows from dry-off to 5 days after calving were sampled. For every cow, each quarter received a different treatment: (i) bismuth salnitrate (internal teat sealant, OrbSeal®, Zoetis, Italy), front right quarter; (ii) cephalonium dihydrate (Cepravin®, MSD, Italy), rear right quarter; (iii) benzathine cloxacillin (Cloxalene dry, Ati, Italy), rear left quarter. No treatment was applied to the remaining quarter (front left) which served as experimental control. For 16S rRNA gene sequencing, bacterial DNA was extracted from 5 ml of milk samples, amplified using the primers for the V3–V4 hypervariable regions and sequenced in one MiSeq (Illumina) run with 2 × 250-base paired-end reads. Bacteriological results confirmed that the quarters were all healthy. The phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria were the most abundant for all treatments and controls at all three timepoints, accounting for over 80% of the entire milk microbiota composition. No significant differences were found between treatments and controls in terms of the major alpha and beta diversity indexes, revealing that antibiotic, and non-antibiotic treatments for selective dry-cow therapy did not alter significantly the milk microbiome of dairy cows. The milk microbiota composition showed a clear evolution over the lactation cycle, and the overall changes in the milk microbiota diversity over the lactation cycle were mainly independent of treatments.

Highlights

  • Intramammary infections (IMI) are still the disease class with the largest prevalence in dairy cattle farms worldwide [e.g., 24.8% of cows reported to be affected in the USA in 2013; [1]]

  • At the end of the experiment, somatic cell count (SCC) increased in the control group (+41.0%), and decreased with the teat sealant (−22.1%), cephalonium (−53.5%), and cloxacillin (−66.9%) treatments (Table 1)

  • The antibiotics cephalonium and cloxacillin have been tested against a nonantibiotic treatment based on the application of an internal teat sealant, on a quarter by quarter basis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intramammary infections (IMI) are still the disease class with the largest prevalence in dairy cattle farms worldwide [e.g., 24.8% of cows reported to be affected in the USA in 2013; [1]]. The most common mastitis control protocols include blanket dry-cow therapy (BDCT), which relies on the antibiotic treatment of every cow during the dry period, and selective dry-cow therapy (SDCT), which targets those animals and specific mammary quarters that are infected and need to be treated [5, 6]. Internal teat sealants (ITS) are a class of non-antimicrobial products that has proven to be just as efficacious as dry-cow therapy (DCT) in the prevention of IMI during the dry period. Studies have found that SDCT is better than BDCT in the prevention and treatment of IMI during the dry period and can reduce the use of antimicrobials by 21% [6, 17, 18]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call