Abstract

Cilostazol may have a positive chronotropic or pro-arrhythmic effect. However, there have been no randomized trials to confirm these effects. This randomized prospective trial compared dual (DAT, aspirin and clopidogrel, n=114) versus triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT, DAT plus cilostazol, n=113) at baseline and after six months in patients receiving intracoronary drug-eluting stents (DES). The primary endpoint was the 24-hour heart rate (24h-HR) at six months determined using 24h-Holter ECG monitoring. The secondary endpoints were the 24h-HR ≥70 bpm, 24h-HR increase ≥5 bpm and the counts or presence of arrhythmias. At six months after DES implantation, the 24h-HR (73 [68-83] vs. 68 [62-75] bpm, p<0.001), presence of a 24h-HR ≥70 bpm (71.4 vs. 47.1%, p<0.001) and presence of a 24h-HR increase ≥5 bpm (44.8 vs. 24.5%, p=0.002) were significantly higher for the TAT group than for the DAT group. A multivariate analysis showed that the use of cilostazol (OR: 3.10, p=0.035) and a baseline 24h-HR <70 bpm (OR: 4.60, p<0.001) were strong predictors of a 24h-HR increase ≥5 bpm. However, there were no significant intergroup differences in arrhythmias. Cilostazol appears to result in an increase in the 24h-HR after DES implantation. Therefore, some caution should be exercised regarding the use of cilostazol in patients with tachycardia, when planning DES implantation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call