A randomized comparison of sirolimus- vs. paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of bifurcation lesions by single stent and kissing balloon: Results of the SINGLE KISS trial

Abstract

BackgroundIn the treatment of bifurcation lesions, routine stenting of both branches has thus far failed to demonstrate a clear clinical advantage over a provisional one-stent strategy. On the other hand, large scale data evaluating different stent types for clinical outcomes after one-stent treatment with final kissing inflation (FKI) of bifurcation lesions is also limited. This prospective study evaluated the clinical and angiographic outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) vs. sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in single crossover main branch stenting followed by FKI in patients with bifurcation lesions. MethodsWe randomized 800 patients with single bifurcation lesions to PES (n=400) and SES (n=400) groups. ResultsCrossover rates to the two-stent strategy were low in both groups (PES 1.5%, SES 2.8%; p=0.23). At 1year, there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of this study, target lesion revascularization rate (PES 3.8%, SES 3.2%, hazard ratio 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 1.76; p=0.62). Stent thrombosis occurred in only 1 case in the SES group after 282days. At 9months, a total of 593 patients underwent quantitative coronary measurement. The main branch restenosis rate in the PES group was significantly higher than that of the SES group (PES 12.2%, SES 5.5%; p=0.004), however both groups exhibited similar high side branch restenosis rates (PES 17.2%, SES 19.3%; p=0.6). ConclusionsIn patients with bifurcation lesions, a single stent strategy using PES and SES with FKI indicated similar 1year clinical outcomes and safety profiles.