Abstract

BackgroundObjective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are important aspects of assessment in medical education. There is anecdotal evidence suggesting that students with non-native English accents (NNEA) may be subjected to unconscious bias. It is imperative to minimise the examiners’ bias so that the difference in the scores reflects students’ clinical competence. Research shows NNEAs can cause stereotyping, often leading to the speaker being negatively judged. However, no medical education study has looked at the influence of NNEAs in assessment.MethodsThis is a randomized, single-blinded controlled trial. Four videos of one mock OSCE station were produced. A professional actor played a medical student. Two near identical scripts were prepared. Two videos showed the actor speaking with an Indian accent and two videos showed the actor speaking without the accent in either script. Forty-two OSCE examiners in the United Kingdom (UK) were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups. They watched two videos online, each with either script, each with a different script. One video with a NNEA and one video was without. Checklist item scores were analysed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric independent samples median test. Global scores were analysed with descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney test.ResultsThirty-two examiners completed the study. The average scores for the checklist items (41.6 points) did not change when the accent variable was changed. Independent samples median test showed no statistically significant relationship between the accent and the scores (p = 0.787). For the global scores received by the videos with the NNEA, there were one less ‘Good’ grade and one more ‘Fail’ grade compared to those without the NNEA. Mann-Whitney test on global score showed lower scores for videos with NNEA (p = 0.661).ConclusionsExaminers were not biased either positively or negatively towards NNEAs when providing checklist or global scores. Further study is required to validate the findings of this study. More discussion is warranted to consider how the accent should be considered in current medical education assessment.RegistrationTrial registration completed trial, ID: ISRCTN17360102, Retrospectively registered on 15/04/2020.

Highlights

  • Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are important aspects of assessment in medical education

  • OSCE examiners in the United Kingdom (UK) were recruited between 27th March 2019 to 10th April 2019

  • This study demonstrates that the non-native English accents (NNEA) does not affect the checklist items and global scores in OSCEs at a statistically significant level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are important aspects of assessment in medical education. It is imperative to minimise the examiners’ bias so that the difference in the scores reflects students’ clinical competence. No medical education study has looked at the influence of NNEAs in assessment. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are assessment tools commonly used for assessing clinical competence [1, 2]. At an OSCE, medical students rotate through a set number of stations. Each time a student enters a station, they are given a scenario with a task to complete, including practical procedures or patient managements. It is reported OSCEs are superior to other assessment methods such as written examination or long cases [3] due to the high construct validity, the standardised cases and marking schemes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call