A quantitative study of intracranial hypotensive syndrome by magnetic resonance

Abstract

ObjectivesThe study aims to investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of intracranial hypotension syndrome (IHS) and the change of quantitative indicators, so as to yield a deeper understanding of the disease. Patients and methodsThe clinical data and MRI findings of 26 cases of IHS which were confirmed by lumbar puncture were retrospectively analyzed. Two physicians evaluated the MRI findings including thickening and enhancement of dural, pituitary enlargement, subdural effusion (hematocele), venous engorgement and brain sagging, and measured the quantitative indicators including mamillopontine distance and pontomesencephalic angle. The consistency between the two results of the physicians was assessed by Kappa consistency test. The differences of mamillopontine distance and pontomesencephalic angle between the patient group and the control group were determined by paired t-test. The diagnostic efficiency of mamillopontine distance and pontomesencephalic angle was assessed by area under the ROC curve, and their best diagnostic thresholds were also determined, respectively. Age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers controls (n=26) were recruited and served as the control group. ResultsAll of the 26 patients suffered from the characterized by orthostatic headache of IHS. The clinical evaluations of dural thickening and enhancement, pituitary enlargement, subdural effusion (hematocele), venous engorgement by the two physicians showed excellent agreements (κ=0.808, 1 and 0.906, P<0.01), and the clinical evaluations of brain sagging showed medium agreements (κ=0.606, P<0.01). The mamillopontine distance and pontomesencephalic angle of the patient group were 5.4±1.6mm and 47.8±8.7°, respectively, which were obviously less than those of the control group (6.9±1.1mm and 61.0±6.1°, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (t=−4.563, P<0.01; t=−.329, P<0.01). The area under ROC curve of mamillopontine distance and pontomesencephalic angle were 0.774 and 0.908, respectively, and the diagnostic value of pontomesencephalic angle was higher than that of the mamillopontine distance. The sensitivity and specificity were 73.1% and 73.1%, respectively, when diagnostic threshold of mamillopontine distance was 6.4mm. The sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 96.2%, when diagnostic threshold of pontomesencephalic angle was 51.7°. ConclusionThe MRI findings presented characteristic features of IHS. The quantitative indicators including mamillopontine distance and pontomesencephalic angle were helpful for clinical diagnosis of subjective findings of IHS.