Abstract
Active thermographic inspection is a very powerful tool for many areas of science. However, there is no agreement about the proper stimulation and post-processing method for a particular material and defect type, which forces technicians to carry out trial and error tests. This study presents a comparison of three stimulation and six post-processing thermographic inspection methods applied to aeronautical carbon fibre reinforced polymer with different kind of simulated defects. The obtained results have been quantitatively assessed using the signal-to-noise ratio metric. Conclusions provide recommendations for technicians interested in thermographic inspection of this type of material.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
