Abstract
In India, the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) recommends a heuristic method for medium-scale (1:25,000/1:50,000) landslide susceptibility mapping. This is based on fixed ratings of geofactors, without the inclusion of landslide inventory information. In BIS method, the pre-defined ratings of geofactors are applied over diverse areas, irrespective of the terrain-specific spatial inter-dependence of geofactors and landslide types, which leads to rather moderate prediction. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of the existing BIS method in Darjeeling Himalaya through a quantitative method adapting weights of evidence (WofE) modeling. The quantified spatial associations between specific geofactors for different landslide types and failure mechanisms that were generated, using this method showed improved prediction rates as compared to the BIS method of fixed ratings of geofactors. We therefore recommend adjusting the existing BIS guidelines by inclusions of weights, derived locally through quantitative spatial analysis of landslide inventories and geofactor maps.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
