Abstract
Abstract Background Using 12 healthy adults, it was shown that a reduction in mean glucose concentration follows intermittent gastric feeds, not continuous: a desirable result for hospitalized patients. A numerical study comparing glucose dynamics after intermittent gastric and continuous post-pyloric feeds may inform the design of a similar clinical study in the critical care setting. Methods A mathematical model was used to construct a small virtual crossover study comparing intermittent gastric feeds and continuous post-pyloric feeds. The model, validated for eight diabetic patients, produced maximum glucose concentration, mean glucose concentration and glucose concentration standard deviation data. Simulations were repeated after renal insulin clearance was increased by 50%, a common physiologic alteration in critical illness. Five hypothetical patients with stress hyperglycemia also underwent simulation. Results Mean glucose concentration was significantly lower after intermittent gastric feeds in type 1 diabetics and in the stress hyperglycemia patients. Without insulin therapy, intermittent gastric feeds increased maximum glucose concentration more than continuous post-pyloric feeds, and glucose concentration standard deviation was largest after intermittent gastric feeds in all patients. Also, the continuous glucose concentration data suggests that the total amount of insulin required to treat patients with stress hyperglycemia would be least in the intermittent feed arm. Finally, data collection with a continuous glucose-monitoring device might be required to resolve maximum glucose and glucose standard deviation differences between the study arms. Conclusions This is the first examination of glucose dynamics following intermittent gastric feeds in a critical care setting. A small crossover clinical study could demonstrate that patients with stress hyperglycemia require less insulin following intermittent, not continuous, enteric feeds. Preliminary data from a clinical trial is reviewed and is found consistent with the results reported here.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.