Abstract

BackgroundAs more people are living with one or more chronic health conditions, supporting patients to become activated, self-managers of their conditions has become a key health policy focus both in the UK and internationally. There is also growing evidence in the UK that those with long term health conditions have an increased risk of being food insecure. While international evidence indicates that food insecurity adversely affects individual’s health condition management capability, little is known about how those so affected manage their condition(s) in this context. An investigation of lived experience of health condition management was undertaken with food insecure people living in north east Scotland. The study aimed to explore the challenges facing food insecure people in terms of, i. their self-care condition management practices, and ii. disclosing and discussing the experience of managing their condition with a health care professional, and iii. Notions of the support they might wish to receive from them.MethodsTwenty in-depth interviews were conducted with individuals attending a food bank and food pantry in north east Scotland. Interview audio recordings were fully transcribed and thematically analysed.ResultsIndividuals reporting multiple physical and mental health conditions, took part in the study. Four main themes were identified i.e.: 1. food practices, trade-offs and compromises, that relate to economic constraints and lack of choice; 2. illness experiences and food as they relate to physical and mental ill-health; 3. (in) visibility of participants’ economic vulnerability within health care consultations; and 4. perceptions and expectations of the health care system.ConclusionsThis study, the first of its kind in the UK, indicated that participants’ health condition management aspirations were undermined by the experience of food insecurity, and that their health care consultations in were, on the whole, devoid of discussions of those challenges. As such, the study indicated practical and ethical implications for health care policy, practice and research associated with the risk of intervention-generated health inequalities that were suggested by this study. Better understanding is needed about the impact of household food insecurity on existing ill health, wellbeing and health care use across the UK.

Highlights

  • As more people are living with one or more chronic health conditions, supporting patients to become activated, self-managers of their conditions has become a key health policy focus both in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally

  • Whilst time constraints on general practitioner (GP) and other health care professionals are recognised, there has to be wider recognition that people experiencing food insecurity may be struggling to manage their health condition due to resource constraints that has led to food insecurity, and are doing so without the knowledge and appropriate support of their health care professionals

  • This study indicates a range of practical and ethical implications for policy, practice and research associated with health care professional support for self-care

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As more people are living with one or more chronic health conditions, supporting patients to become activated, self-managers of their conditions has become a key health policy focus both in the UK and internationally. As an increasing number of people are living with one or more chronic health conditions, the practice of ‘support for self-management’ has become a key health policy focus both at home and internationally over the last decade [1,2,3]. Self-care is associated with concepts of patient empowerment, choice and control [6, 7] While this approach has had positive outcomes for some people, the concept has not achieved the universal and sustained behaviour change and condition control sought by such policy [8,9,10]. Support for self-care from health care professionals has been found in some cases to have had the opposite effect to that intended, i.e. disempowering and undermining as opposed to enhancing patients’ experiences of health care [12, 13]

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.