Abstract
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) dispensing is strongly associated with treatment adherence. Among illicit drug-using populations, whom experience greater structural barriers to adherence, directly administered antiretroviral therapy (DAAT) is often regarded as a stronger predictor of optimal adherence over self-administered medications. In Vancouver, Canada, people living with HIV (PLHIV) who use drugs and live in low-income housing are a critical population for treatment support. This group is typically able to access two key DAAT models, daily delivery and daily pickup, in addition to ART self-administration. This ethno-epidemiological qualitative study explores how key dispensing models impact ART adherence among PLHIV who use drugs living in low-income housing, and how this is framed by structural vulnerability. Semi-structured interviews lasting 30–45 minutes were conducted between February and May 2018 with 31 PLHIV who use drugs recruited from an ongoing prospective cohort of PLHIV who use drugs. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using QSR International’s NVivo 12 software. Interviews focused on housing, drug use, and HIV management. Models that constrained agency were found to have negative impacts on adherence and quality of life. Treatment interruptions were framed by structural vulnerabilities (e.g., housing vulnerability) that impacted ability to maintain adherence under certain dispensing models, and led participants to consider other models. Participants using DAAT models which accounted for their structural vulnerabilities (e.g., mobility issues, housing instability), credited these models for their treatment adherence, but also acknowledged factors that constrained agency, and the negative impacts this could have on both adherence, and quality of life. Being able to integrate ART into an established routine is key to supporting ART adherence. ART models that account for the structural vulnerability of PLHIV who use drugs and live in low-income housing are necessary and housing-based supports could be critical, but the impacts of such models on agency must be considered to ensure optimal adherence.
Highlights
Access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is critical to achieving individual, community, and population-level decreases in HIV-related morbidity, mortality, and viral transmission [1,2,3]
Optimal engagement in ART (i.e., 95% adherence rate) is recommended to achieve undetectable viral loads among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and to prevent further transmission [4], and is a central component of a combination HIV prevention and treatment strategy known as Seek, Test, Treat, and Retain (STTR) [1]
All but one of our participants were currently taking ART, and over half indicated that they use illicit drugs daily
Summary
Access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is critical to achieving individual-, community-, and population-level decreases in HIV-related morbidity, mortality, and viral transmission [1,2,3]. Optimal engagement in ART (i.e., 95% adherence rate) is recommended to achieve undetectable viral loads among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and to prevent further transmission [4], and is a central component of a combination HIV prevention and treatment strategy known as Seek, Test, Treat, and Retain (STTR) [1]. Despite global efforts to scale up access and adherence to ART, and overall engagement in HIV primary care [5, 6], some key affected populations, people who use illicit drugs (PWUD), experience high rates of suboptimal ART outcomes, including lower rates of viral suppression [3, 7], and treatment interruptions [8, 9]. PLHIV who use drugs living in low-income housing are an important population for treatment support programs
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.