Abstract
Malnutrition remains one of the most rigid outcomes to be addressed by policies and interventions. Although the forms and predictors of malnutrition have been extensively studied, relatively less focus has been placed on the micro-realities of policy implementation that can explain the barriers to achieving better service utilisation outcomes. To fill this gap and gain insights into the socio-environmental barriers to the supplementary nutrition programme, a micro-level qualitative study was undertaken on the beneficiary experience from one of the largest nutrition services in the world, the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) in India. Combining qualitative phenomenological with a retrospective design, the study compared the service experience of current ICDS to its erstwhile regime called the ‘UNICEF-Dular’ using data from a 2018 study in Bihar. Thirty beneficiaries, including 12 mothers with children in both regimes, 10 front-line workers (FLW) and erstwhile second-line workers, and two Bihar-UNICEF officials, were included in the FGDs and interviews. The analysis revealed that strategic changes in the programme regarding downscaling personnel by removing second-line workers, selective coverage in supplementary nutrition, hazardous work conditions, the low capability of FLW, and social incoherence are barriers to service delivery in nutrition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.