Abstract

Previous research has focused on determining whether the quantitative EEG (QEEG) can discriminate a traumatic brain injury (TBI) participant from a normal individual. The research has differed with respect to the critical variables involved in the discrimination task. All the research has limited its approach to the collection of eyes-closed data and most confine themselves to less than 32 Hz. The present research employs four cognitive activation tasks, an eyes-closed task, 19 locations, Spectral Correlation Coefficient (SCC) and phase algorithms in the beta2 frequency range (32–64 Hz), and the relative power of beta2 in six frontal locations to obtain 100% correct identification in original discriminant analysis. In addition, 50 random misclassifications—involving different participants—across the five tasks in a group of 196 subjects were correctly identified as misclassifications. To determine if a learning disability would show a similar pattern to a TBI pattern, a preliminary analysis of a group of 94 normal and learning disability (LD) participants were examined for their QEEG differences. The pattern evident in the analysis for the LD group (decreased coherence and phase alpha) was not the pattern evident in the TBI group, while the TBI pattern of decreased coherence and phase beta2 was not dominant in the LD group.

Highlights

  • A method that can obtain 100% accuracy is a valuable aide in the diagnosis of a traumatic brain injury and is a valuable asset to the medical personnel in charge of rendering the diagnosis

  • In the case of a pre-existing concussion the software would not be accurate in the determination of a present concussion

  • This problem could be addressed by a baseline evaluation prior to the athletic season

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tabano et al (1988) investigated posterior activity of subjects (N = 18) at 3 and 10 days following a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) and found an increase in the mean power of the lower alpha range (8–10 Hz), a reduction in fast alpha (10.5–13.5 Hz) with an accompanying shift of the mean power of the lower alpha range (8–10 Hz), and reduction in fast alpha (10.5–13.5 Hz) with an accompanying shift of the mean alpha frequency to lower values They reported a reduction in fast beta (20.5–36 Hz) activity. Three independent cross validations (reported within the original research) resulted in accuracy rates of 84%, 93%, and 90%

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.