Abstract
This study investigated the amount of agreement existing among school personnel in Iowa concerning the role of the superintendent in collective negotiations and the scope and structure of the collective negotiation process, Through the utilization of Q-methodology, two significant types or groups of school personnel were identified, each demonstrating a high degree of similarity in their attitudes towards collective negotiations. Identification procedures revealed that personnel predominantly from rural and urban school districts comprised one type, while personnel from the central city school districts made up the second type. Investigation of the pattern of responses led the investigator to label the first group Localites and the second group Metropolites.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
