A prospective year-long follow-up of lurasidone use in clinical practice: factors predicting treatment persistence.

Abstract

Background:Our aim was to follow up patients prescribed lurasidone over 1 year to determine factors predicting treatment persistence.Methods:We used noninterventional, observational, prospective follow up of patients consecutively prescribed lurasidone in a large inner-city NHS mental health trust. We also performed retrospective analysis of outcomes from patient case notes.Results:Data were available for 69 patients consecutively prescribed lurasidone, of whom three (4%) were lost to follow up. Out of the 66 patients not lost to follow-up, 21 (32%) remained on lurasidone at 1 year. The main reasons for discontinuation were perceived ineffectiveness (49% of discontinuers) and adverse effects (36% of discontinuers), whilst a further seven refused all treatment. Median treatment time on lurasidone was 154 days (95% confidence interval (CI), 33–275). Patients who were not treatment-resistant had a substantially reduced risk of discontinuation, relative risk (RR) 0.18 [95% CI 0.08, 0.41, p < 0.001]. Medium doses (>37–74 mg) of lurasidone reduced the risk of discontinuation by 75% [RR 0.25 (95% CI 0.11, 0.58, p = 0.001)]; high doses (>74–148 mg) reduced the risk of discontinuation by 86% [RR 0.14 (95% CI 0.06, 0.35, p < 0.001)]. Risk of discontinuation was approximately doubled when the reason for prescribing lurasidone was poor tolerability of prior treatment [RR 2.01 (95% CI 1.05, 3.85, p = 0.035)].Conclusion:The likelihood of treatment continuation with lurasidone can be vastly improved by targeting individuals most likely to benefit and by using optimal doses.