Abstract

The (8–12 Hz) neocortical alpha rhythm is associated with shifts in attention across sensory systems, and is thought to represent a sensory gating mechanism for the inhibitory control of cortical processing. The present preliminary study sought to explore whether alpha frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) could modulate endogenous alpha power in the somatosensory system, and whether the hypothesized modulation would causally impact perception of tactile stimuli at perceptual threshold. We combined electroencephalography (EEG) with simultaneous brief and intermittent tACS applied over primary somatosensory cortex at individuals’ endogenous alpha frequency during a tactile detection task (n = 12 for EEG, n = 20 for behavior). EEG-measured pre-stimulus alpha power was higher on non-perceived than perceived trials, and analogous perceptual correlates emerged in early components of the tactile evoked response. Further, baseline normalized tactile detection performance was significantly lower during alpha than sham tACS, but the effect did not last into the post-tACS time period. Pre- to post-tACS changes in alpha power were linearly dependent upon baseline state, such that alpha power tended to increase when pre-tACS alpha power was low, and decrease when it was high. However, these observations were comparable in both groups, and not associated with evidence of tACS-induced alpha power modulation. Nevertheless, the tactile stimulus evoked response potential (ERP) revealed a potentially lasting impact of alpha tACS on circuit dynamics. The post-tACS ERP was marked by the emergence of a prominent peak ∼70 ms post-stimulus, which was not discernible post-sham, or in either pre-stimulation condition. Computational neural modeling designed to simulate macroscale EEG signals supported the hypothesis that the emergence of this peak could reflect synaptic plasticity mechanisms induced by tACS. The primary lesson learned in this study, which commanded a small sample size, was that while our experimental paradigm provided some evidence of an influence of tACS on behavior and circuit dynamics, it was not sufficient to induce observable causal effects of tACS on EEG-measured alpha oscillations. We discuss limitations and suggest improvements that may help further delineate a causal influence of tACS on cortical dynamics and perception in future studies.

Highlights

  • Since its discovery almost a century ago (Berger, 1969), the alpha rhythm remains one of the most conspicuous yet elusive signals that can be recorded from the human brain non-invasively

  • Replicating our prior MEG results (Jones et al., 2007, 2010), we found that EEG-measured pre-stimulus alpha power (C3 electrode) was higher on non-perceived (“miss”) than perceived (“hit”) trials, and analogous perceptual correlates emerged in early components of the tactile evoked response

  • We also found that tactile detection performance decreased over time for sham and alpha Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) groups, and there was a significant difference in tactile detection performance between alpha and sham tACS groups during, but not after, tACS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since its discovery almost a century ago (Berger, 1969), the alpha rhythm remains one of the most conspicuous yet elusive signals that can be recorded from the human brain non-invasively. Though the alpha rhythm likely stems from different generators across sensory systems (Frey et al, 2014), differences in alpha power and/or phase consistently predict sensory perception (Rice and Hagstrom, 1989; Thut, 2006; van Dijk et al, 2008; Jones et al, 2010). This has led to the hypothesis that the alpha rhythm represents a functionally relevant sensory gating mechanism for the inhibitory control of cortical processing (see reviews, Klimesch et al, 2007; Jensen and Mazaheri, 2010). Such effects can last for an extended period of time (30 min), and depend on dynamic brain states, such as baseline endogenous alpha power (Neuling et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call