Abstract

ObjectiveFusion prostate biopsy (FPB) has become a popular technique in biopsy-naïve patients, though not accepted as a standard approach (yet). In this study, we aimed to present the clinical outcomes of biopsy-naïve patients who underwent FPB.Material and methodsThe study included 400 biopsy-naïve patients aged 45-75 years who had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 2-10 ng/ml and were detected with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) ≥3 lesion on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided FPB. A combined biopsy (CB) was performed in each patient, in which 2-4 cores were obtained for suspicious lesions by targeted biopsy (TB) and then 12-core standard prostate biopsy (SPB) was conducted in the same session. Cancer detection rates, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates, histological upgrading rates, and false negative rates were determined.ResultsThe 400 patients had a mean age of 62.01±7.00 years and a mean PSA value of 6.84±1.87 ng/ml. Overall PCa detection rate was 50% (200/400). The csPCa detection rates for TB, SPB, and CB were 25.0%, 31.8%, and 44.0%, respectively (p<0.001). In PIRADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, CB had a csPCa detection rate of 29.2%, 54%, and 64.8%, respectively (p<0.001). The ratio of false negativity was significantly higher for TB compared to SPB (43.2% vs. 27.8%, p=0.003), whereas no significant difference was found between these two techniques with regard to upgrading rates although TB had a higher rate (19.6% vs. 13.7%, p=0.144).ConclusionFPB, a combined approach involving TB and SPB, was revealed as the most successful technique in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA<10 ng/ml due to its high cancer detection rates and low false negative rates.

Highlights

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading urological cancer worldwide [1]

  • The ratio of false negativity was significantly higher for targeted biopsy (TB) compared to standard prostate biopsy (SPB) (43.2% vs. 27.8%, p=0.003), whereas no significant difference was found between these two techniques with regard to upgrading rates TB had a higher rate (19.6% vs. 13.7%, p=0.144)

  • In one of our previous studies, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of our results of 80 patients that underwent Fusion prostate biopsy (FPB) and we found that the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates for TB, SPB, and combined biopsy (CB) were 25.0%, 36.3%, and 43.8%, respectively [10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fusion prostate biopsy (FPB) has recently emerged as a popular and important tool in the diagnosis of PCa [2]. FPB can be applied in the form of targeted biopsy (TB) which is based only on obtaining specimens from suspicious lesions or in combined biopsy (CB) in which 10- to 12-core standard prostate biopsy (SPB) is applied in addition to TB [3]. In the early 2010s, multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided FPB was recommended only for patients with a history of negative biopsy and for patients with ongoing cancer suspicion [4,5,6]. FPB has been shown to be an effective method in biopsy-naïve patients who have moderate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call