A prospective randomized trial comparing the pocket-creation method and conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancers and precancerous lesions

Abstract

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used as a standard treatment regimen for early gastric cancers (EGCs). However, such an approach is time-consuming and has a high risk of perforation and bleeding in some corner-site lesions because of the obscured view and difficulty in submucosal lifting. The newly developed pocket-creation method (PCM) provides a clearer view and better traction of the submucosal layer than conventional ESD (c-ESD). Nevertheless, no prospective randomized study has evaluated the efficacy of the PCM in EGCs and precancerous lesions. MethodsThis was a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients with superficial gastric neoplastic lesions≥20mm were randomly assigned to the PCM-ESD group or c-ESD group. The primary outcome was dissection speed. ResultsThere were 28 patients in the PCM-ESD group and 27 in the c-ESD group. The median dissection speed was significantly higher in the PCM-ESD group than in the c-ESD group (21.5 mm2/min vs. 14.3 mm2/min, P<0.001). Meanwhile, the operation time in the PCM-ESD group was significantly shorter than that in the c-ESD group (30min vs. 40min，P=0.047). In multiple linear regression analysis, the treatment method was independently associated with the resection speed of ESD. ConclusionsPCM-ESD was an effective and safe treatment for EGCs and precancerous lesions.